Use of ChatGPT and other generative AI tools for local business recommendations rose from 6% of surveyed US consumers the previous year to 45%, making it the third most popular recommendation source in that survey. “rising from 6% last year to 45%” | BrightLocal, Local Consumer Review Survey 2026 Published 2026-02-11; page modified 2026-10-21 | Representative panel of 1,002 US adult consumers via SurveyMonkey Caveat: US-only, self-reported 'used in the last year', not frequency or share of searches. The jump from 6% to 45% compares two surveys and may partly reflect question wording; treat as direction of travel, not precise. Vendor-published. |
In Pew's browsing-data study, Google users who saw an AI summary clicked a traditional result link in 8% of visits, versus 15% of visits without an AI summary; they clicked a link inside the summary in 1% of visits. 18% of the studied searches produced an AI summary. “clicked on a traditional search result link in 8% of all visits” | Pew Research Center, 'Google users are less likely to click on links when an AI summary appears in the results' 2025-07-22 | Browsing activity of 900 US adults (KnowledgePanel Digital) during March 1-31, 2025; dataset of 68,879 unique Google searches Caveat: US adults, March 2025 only; AI summary prevalence has changed since. All search types, not specific to local-intent queries. Independent non-profit source. |
Ahrefs found that for informational keywords, the presence of a Google AI Overview correlates with a 58% lower average click-through rate for the top-ranking page (Dec 2025 data); position-one CTR on AI Overview keywords fell from 0.073 in Dec 2023 to 0.016 in Dec 2025. “now correlates with a 58% lower average clickthrough rate” | Ahrefs, 'Update: AI Overviews Reduce Clicks by 58%' Published 2026-02-04; page modified 2026-10-15 | 300,000 keywords (150,000 with an AI Overview, 150,000 informational without), aggregated Google Search Console desktop CTR, Dec 2023 vs Dec 2025 Caveat: Correlation, not proof of causation. Informational keywords on desktop only; country not stated on the page; not local-intent queries, so do not apply to 'near me' or map-pack searches. Vendor-published but method is clearly stated. |
In a Whitespark test of 540 queries, AI Overviews appeared on an average of 68% of local business-type queries, while a local pack appeared on an average of 39%. “AI Overviews are currently appearing in 68% of local business-type queries” | Whitespark (Canadian local SEO company), 'The Prevalence of AI Overviews in Local Search' 2025-05-12 | Manual collection, 540 queries across 3 US cities (Houston, Phoenix, Denver) and 6 industries (plumbers, personal injury lawyers, dentists, optometrists, medical clinics, real estate agents); mix of local, informational and hybrid intent Caveat: US cities, large metros, and none of the 6 industries is restaurants. Collected May 2025; AI Overview prevalence changes quickly. Page itself says figures may vary for smaller towns. Query mix includes informational and hybrid queries, so it is not the rate for pure 'near me' queries. Vendor-published. |
Among surveyed consumers who recently used conversational or voice AI, only 19% trusted AI search tools for local search, versus 45% who trusted traditional search engine results; 68% had used ChatGPT to research local products or services. “only 19% trust AI search tools versus traditional search engine results (45%)” | Yext press release, 'Yext Report: AI Search Gains Consumer Trust' (The Rise of AI Search Archetypes) 2025-07-22 | Online survey by Researchscape for Yext, March 20 to April 6, 2025; 2,237 adults in the US, UK, France and Germany who bought online in the past three months and used voice search or conversational AI; weighted by country population, age and gender Caveat: Not representative of all consumers: every respondent was already a voice-search or AI user. No Canadian respondents. Vendor-published (Yext sells listings and visibility products) though method is stated. The 68% figure counts only people who had used AI platforms; do not present it as a share of the general population. |
Nearly half of Canadians use AI tools such as ChatGPT or Copilot at least weekly, rising to roughly 60-70% among Canadians under 45. “Nearly half of Canadians use AI tools like ChatGPT or Copilot at least weekly” | Toronto Metropolitan University Diversity Institute, 'AI and Chat Use: Lessons Learned' (Leger survey) 2026 (survey fielded April 14-27, 2026; exact publication date not shown) | Web survey of 1,700 Canadians aged 18+ from Leger's online panel (includes a booster sample of 200 people with an immigration background), in English and French Caveat: Measures general AI tool use, not use for local business or restaurant discovery. Online panel; the booster sample may affect overall weighting. Academic source; fieldwork was with Leger. |
56% of surveyed Canadian consumers already use generative AI tools for shopping tasks, most often product research (33%), personalised recommendations (26%) and finding deals (20%); 87% report lingering concerns. “56% of respondents already use Gen AI tools for various shopping tasks” | Omnisend press release (survey conducted by Cint) 2025-08-21 (survey fielded July 2025) | 1,046 Canadian consumers surveyed by Cint, quotas on age, gender and place of residence; 'nationally representative among users' Caveat: Vendor-commissioned (Omnisend is an email/SMS marketing platform) and about online shopping, not local or restaurant discovery. The sample is representative 'among users', which may mean online panel users. Use only as a Canadian signal that AI shopping research is mainstream. |